Creation Science

Creation Science Rebuttals

Creation Magazine

Fossil Pollen in Grand Canyon Overturns Plant Evolution

Volume 12, Issue 1, December 1989

       

Review by Greg Neyman

© Old Earth Ministries

    

     An interesting article by Carl Wieland on the young earth creation science website Answers in Genesis  proclaims that "Fossil Pollen in Grand Canyon Overturns Plant Evolution."1  The authors go on to state, "Finding fossil pollen grains in rock classed as 'Precambrian' (long before seed plants are thought to have evolved) is as devastating to the whole evolutionary framework as finding a human bone in a Carboniferous coal seam."

 

     They are absolutely correct, this would be a blow to those proposing evolution of plants...or would it?

 

     First, let me state that I do not believe in evolution.  However, the evidence for it is strong.  There are old earth creationists who believe in evolution, and this is an acceptable form of belief.   So, what implications does this article have for old-earth creationists, both theistic evolutionists and progressive creationists?

 

     The answer is...none.  It has nothing to do with the age of the earth.  In fact, even the evolutionist will look at this and say, "Wow, I guess plants were around long before we first thought they were," and they will change their timelines to more accurately reflect this new data.

 

     Does this disprove the old age of the earth...not a chance.  We've already seen that you cannot create the strata of the Grand Canyon during the time of Noah's Flood, and you can't produce chalk in a Noah's Flood model, and all other evidences for a young earth are simply false.  It simply means pollen was around sooner than we first thought.

 

     The conclusion states, "This is contrary to expectations based on the accepted geologic column."  If true, it is time to make an adjustment in the column.  Nothing more can be implied.  When creation science advocates make finds like this, they need to submit them to the trade journals in order to inform all scientists of the need to adjust their models.  Have they done this?  If not, go for it! 

1  Creation Magazine, Volume 12, Issue 1.  Published on the web at answersingenesis.org/home/area/Magazines/docs/v12n1_pollen.asp

 


 

    If you are not a Christian, and you have been holding out on making a decision for Christ because the Church always preached a message that was contrary to what you saw in the scientific world, then rest assured that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God, and you can believe in Christ and receive salvation, while still believing in an old earth.  Click here for more.

 

    Are you a Christian who believes in young earth creationism?  Now that we have shown the many difficulties of the young earth creation science model in this and many other articles, how does this impact your Christian life?  If you are a young earth creationism believer, click here.

 

 

Creation Magazine 1991

 

Print-Friendly PDF Version of this Page

 

Related Articles

Evolution Articles

Geology Articles

 

To learn more about old earth creationism, see Old Earth Belief, or check out the article Can You Be A Christian and Believe in an Old Earth?  

 Feel free to check out more of this website.  Our goal is to provide rebuttals to the bad science behind young earth creationism, and honor God by properly presenting His creation.