Edited by Greg Neyman
Henry Morris claims that radiometric dating falsely assumes that the initial conditions of the rock at its formation are known, and it is assumed that none of the daughter elements are in the sample at formation.
Henry M., 1974. Scientific Creationism, p. 139.
Isochron methods do not assume that the initial concentrations are known
For some radiometric methods, the assumed initial conditions are reasonable
K-Ar dating assumes there is no argon in the initial sample at formation. This is because it is an inert gas, and would be excluded from the original crystal formation
The concordia method uses lead, which is also not present in mineral formation
Radiocarbon dating is based on the abundance of C-14 in the atmosphere, which can be known
Fission-track dating works because newly formed minerals do not have fission tracks
To learn more on this topic, read the TalkOrigins.org rebuttal.
Radiometric Dating (Wikipedia)
If you are not a Christian, and you have been holding out on making a decision for Christ because the Church always preached a message that was contrary to what you saw in the scientific world, then rest assured that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God, and you can believe in Christ and receive salvation, while still believing in an old earth. Click here for more.
Are you a Christian who believes in young earth creationism? Now that we have shown the many difficulties of the young earth creation science model in this and many other articles, how does this impact your Christian life? If you are a young earth creationism believer, click here.
To learn more
about old earth creationism, see
Old Earth Belief,
or check out the article
Can You Be A
Christian and Believe in an Old Earth?
Feel free to check out more of this website. Our goal is to provide rebuttals to the bad science behind young earth creationism, and honor God by properly presenting His creation.